TheyWorkForYou questionnaire responses from 2010: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/person/12753/stuart-andrew
Asked in September 2008 whether he thought the 24-week limit on abortion should be reduced, Mr Andrew replied:
- "I do believe in a woman's right to choose but the advance in medical technology means I think we do need a reduction to 22 weeks."
The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report of October 2007 had looked at issues including foetal viability, experience of pain, and harm to the mother. It had found no good evidence of any change since the 24-week limit was set in 1990, and hence no new reason for a reduction. However, it acknowledged that the science was only one of many factors to be taken into account when legislating, and did not make any recommendations as to how MPs should vote.
In February 2015 Stuart Andrew voted in favour of allowing mitochondrial donation, which would allow women who carried mitochondrial diseases to give birth to children who would not inherit the disease. An October 2014 briefing report by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which had been investigating the issue for three years, stated that there was no evidence to show that mitochondrial donation was unsafe. However, some religious groups had said that such procedures should not be allowed. After clearing both Houses, mitochondrial donation is now legal, regulated by the HFEA.
Why not help us expand this page with more details of this politician's positions on skeptical and other issues?
- E-Mail them to ask for their opinions (and tell us about it by editing this page!)
- Check their voting record and other information at the External Links listed above.
- Search the media for mentions of them and their positions on issues.
- Use your own brilliant ideas - but make sure you can back them up with a citation!