Jeremy Hunt

From SkepticalVoter
Revision as of 14:48, 29 February 2016 by Skep (Talk | contribs) (Link on Weekend Hospital Admissions)

Jump to: navigation, search

Jeremy Hunt is a Conservative politician who is the Secretary of State for Health and MP for South West Surrey. He was first elected to Parliament at the May 2005 general election.


Alternative Medicine

Note: Please read this section to the end as it shows an evolving picture of Mr Hunt's views on homeopathy.

Jeremy Hunt was one of 206 MPs to sign the March 2007 Early Day Motion 1240[1], supporting NHS homeopathic hospitals. Sean Ellis (a constituent) wrote to him about this. The text of his letter and Mr Hunt's rather non-committal reply can be found on Mr Ellis's website[2]. From Mr Hunt's reply:

"I understand that it is your view that homeopathy is not effective, and therefore that people should not be encouraged to use it as a treatment. However I am afraid that I have to disagree with you on this issue. Homeopathic care is enormously valued by thousands of people and in an NHS that the Government repeatedly tells us is "patient-led" it ought to be available where a doctor and patient believe that a homeopathic treatment may be of benefit to the patient."

In October 2012, shortly after being appointed Health Secretary, Mr Hunt was asked on BBC Radio 4's Today programme if he believed homeopathy works. Instead of answering the question directly he responded:

"I believe that my decisions as health secretary should be based on science and should be evidence-based and driven by evidence.
"I will follow the scientific advice."[3]

In November 2012 he was asked a parliamentary question by David Tredinnick on complementary medicine, mentioning herbal medicine, acupuncture and particularly stressing homeopathy. Mr Hunt replied without mentioning homeopathy at all, but apparently accepting the use of acupuncture:

"There are parts of the country where acupuncture is available on the NHS. This will be clinically led. It needs to be driven by the science, but where there is evidence, and where local doctors think that it would be the best clinical outcome for their patients, that is what they are able to do."[4]

In April 2013, in the context of a measles outbreak in south Wales, concern over MMR vaccination uptake throughout the UK, and reports of homeopaths offering "homeopathic vaccines" for measles, Mr Hunt was asked in Parliament by Sarah Wollaston to "make an unequivocal statement that [homeopathy] products will not give any protection?". Mr Hunt said:

"I am happy to do so and thank my hon. Friend for bringing up the issue. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that homeopathic products can provide protection against measles. The right thing to do is to get two doses of the MMR jab. As I said earlier, anyone whose children, whatever their age, have not had those two doses should contact their GP."[5]

On 6th August 2013, Mr Hunt was interviewed on BBC Radio 5 Live's Breakfast show and asked about his recent meetings with Prince Charles, in which it had been speculated that the pair had talked about homeopathy.

Interviewer: One other thing, it's been reported you met with Prince Charles last month and discussed your mutual support for the use of homeopathy on the NHS. Interesting to hear what you say about it. How can you advocate the use of a treatment that England's Chief Medical Officer, Dame Shirley Davies, dismisses as "rubbish"?
Mr Hunt: Erm, I don't. And, I'm not going to discuss the private discussions that I have with Prince Charles, because we have those discussions on a confidential basis, but I can tell you that I don't support homeopathy. I think that I need to follow the science, and what the science says, what the evidence says, is what I must implement as Health Secretary.
Interviewer: Thank you for that clarification, because there's a lot of chatter about that, as you know.
Mr Hunt: It's a pleasure. It's, yes, I'm afraid I signed an EDM, an Early Day Motion, in the House of Commons when I was a new MP at the request of a constituent, and that has lead to a great deal of that chatter, but I am very happy to clarify for you that I support doing what the scientific evidence says works.[6]

However, it was reported that in December 2013 Mr Hunt asked Chief Medical Officer Sally Davies to review three studies of homeopathy that had been passed to him by David Tredinnick. The studies, whose conclusions supported homeopathy, were two descriptive studies with no control group, and one small unrandomised study[7][8]. The full details of these communications do not appear to be publicly available, and we await further clarification of Mr Hunt's role.

On 1st April 2014, Mr Hunt was asked by David Tredinnick about the integration of western medicine with traditional Chinese medicine. Mr Hunt's response:

"What I have learned is that the most important thing is to follow the scientific evidence. Where there is good evidence for the impact of Chinese medicine, we should look at that, but where there is not, we should not spend NHS money on it."[9][10]


In April 2013, Mr Hunt was asked in Parliament by David Rutley "In the light of the recent measles outbreak in south Wales, does my right hon. Friend agree that the claims made by Dr Andrew Wakefield about the MMR vaccine are both discredited and completely wrong?" Mr Hunt replied:

"I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. What Andrew Wakefield said had no scientific basis and caused huge damage and worry to many thousands of parents. It is very important to reiterate that the scientific way to prevent measles, which can be a horrible and even a fatal disease, is to make sure that children have had two doses of MMR. Parents of children of any age who have not had those doses should contact their GP, particularly in the current circumstances."[11]

In May 2006 Mr Hunt signed EDM 2159 calling for research on AIDS vaccines to be prioritised[12].

Reproductive Issues

In May 2008 in the abortion amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (now Act), Jeremy Hunt voted for the abortion time limit to be lowered to 12 weeks against scientific and medical consensus which is currently 24 weeks[13]. After four separate parliamentary votes on varying time limits, the majority of MPs voted to keep the abortion time limit at 24 weeks, in keeping with scientific and medical consensus, hence no abortion amendments were added to the bill. Hunt also voted on the same date to reduce to 16, and then 22 weeks as subsequent votes were defeated.

However he did vote against the motion on Prospects for life of handicapped child, which would have made it more difficult to abort a handicapped foetus [14].

He also voted for restricting the terms of licensing for human/animal hybrid experiments [15].

In October 2012 it was reported that Mr Hunt said of the legal abortion limit:

"Everyone looks at the evidence and comes to a view about when they think that moment is, and my own view is that 12 weeks is the right point for it,"[16]

Mitochondrial Donation

In February 2015 Jeremy Hunt voted in favour of allowing mitochondrial donation, which would allow women who carried mitochondrial diseases to have genetically related children who would not inherit the disease[17]. An October 2014 briefing report by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which had been investigating the issue for three years, stated that there was no evidence to show that mitochondrial donation was unsafe[18]. However, some religious groups had said that such procedures should not be allowed[19]. After clearing both Houses mitochondrial donation is now legal, regulated by the HFEA.

Early Diagnosis of Dementia

In April 2013 Mr Hunt tweeted:

"Just did dementia speech debunking idea there's no point in early diagnosis: medicine, good care and lifestyle changes can all slow onset"[20]

[He presumably meant "progression" rather than "onset", though we note that would have taken the tweet over 140 characters.]

It is not clear what Mr Hunt meant by "early diagnosis" and if he supported pre-symptomatic screening, which is a questionable policy - see e.g.

Statistics on Weekend Hospital Admissions


Statistics on "Health Tourism"

See: (April 2013)

Medical Innovation ("Saatchi") Bill

In November 2013, as Secretary of State for Health, Mr Hunt announced the consultation process for Lord Saatchi's Medical Innovation Bill. In his statement Mr Hunt wrote that

"The government should do whatever is needed to remove barriers that prevent innovation which can save and improve lives. We must create a climate where clinical pioneers have the freedom to make breakthroughs in treatment.
"The Medical Innovation (No 2) Bill, sponsored by my honourable friend the Member for Northampton North (Michael Ellis), and the comparable Bill introduced by my noble friend Lord Saatchi in the other place, correctly identify the threat of litigation as one such barrier."[21]

However, this anticipated the result of the consultation - when it was published in February 2014 the first question was "Do you have experience or evidence to suggest that the possibility of litigation sometimes deters doctors from innovation?" When published, the final report noted that some respondents had stated they had evidence or experience that litigation deters innovation, but many of the respondents who said "no" were medical bodies, and the two medical defence organisations also answered "no"[22].

(A criticism of the Bill's supporters' actions during the consultation process cat be read at:


Mr Hunt voted to abolish the offences of Blasphemy and Blasphemous libel[23].


Mr Hunt voted with the winning majority on the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations bill, against the majority of his own party [24].

He also voted against an amendment to the Public Order Act 1986, which would have preserved exceptions for criticism or antipathy towards people based on their sexual orientation[25].

He is also on record as being for gay marriage, and supports the right of same sex couples to marry in church if they wish.[26]

He voted voted in favour of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at both its second reading in February 2013[27] and its third reading in May 2013[28].


Mr Hunt signed EDM 2378 in favour of reducing carbon emissions [29].

He voted for the designation of marine conservation zones [30].

Digital Economy Bill

Mr Hunt voted for the Digital Economy Bill, despite referring to it in these terms: "We wanted an iPod, but we got an Amstrad" [31] and "a digital disappointment of colossal proportions" [32].



External Links

Why not help us expand this page with more details of this politician's positions on skeptical and other issues?

  • E-Mail them to ask for their opinions (and tell us about it by editing this page!)
  • Check their voting record and other information at the External Links listed above.
  • Search the media for mentions of them and their positions on issues.
  • Use your own brilliant ideas - but make sure you can back them up with a citation!